Quantcast

Video of the Day

Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Alex Carnevale
(e-mail/tumblr/twitter)

Features Editor
Mia Nguyen
(e-mail)

Reviews Editor
Ethan Peterson

Live and Active Affiliates
This Recording

is dedicated to the enjoyment of audio and visual stimuli. Please visit our archives where we have uncovered the true importance of nearly everything. Should you want to reach us, e-mail alex dot carnevale at gmail dot com, but don't tell the spam robots. Consider contacting us if you wish to use This Recording in your classroom or club setting. We have given several talks at local Rotarys that we feel went really well.

Pretty used to being with Gwyneth

Regrets that her mother did not smoke

Frank in all directions

Jean Cocteau and Jean Marais

Simply cannot go back to them

Roll your eyes at Samuel Beckett

John Gregory Dunne and Joan Didion

Metaphors with eyes

Life of Mary MacLane

Circle what it is you want

Not really talking about women, just Diane

Felicity's disguise

This area does not yet contain any content.

Entries in montreal (3)

Friday
Jul102015

In Which We Falter In This Apprenticeship

Second Haunting

by HEATHER MCROBIE

When I was speaking to some twenty-two year olds in a university bar in England last week I made sure I was kind, in a 27-year old way, to their post-college references: F. Scott and whiskey, blank-canvas silent female icons who the 27-year old female knows are more than conduits for the male imagination. I didn’t say “I’ve heard this before” or even make a face that said it, the way people do to the young. This is not only because I spent a year in my twenties being laughed at unkindly by people five years older than I was. It’s because I remember my own post-college precipice of self, and I did more than just quote a few obvious reference-points. Twenty-two years old was the year I moved from England to Montreal to make Leonard Cohen fall in love with me.

“I’ve heard this before” didn’t come for a while, five years ago  even though thinking back everything I was doing was beyond-obvious. It didn’t come through all of September. There is an old CBC interview of a precipice-of-self Leonard Cohen in the 1960s, where he is shedding the snake-skin of ‘poet’ for ‘singer’ and blitzkreig’ing the CBC interviewer with pre-feminist-revolution charm. He claims with a faux-boldness reserved for male poets that he’s going to change his name to ‘September’. Watch the interview on Youtube if you want to feel all these feelings at once: (1) desire; (2) a feminist urge to reclaim the mid-1960s cardigan-wearing interviewer from the role of nervous, obedient good-girl being teased by the heroic subversive man, encourage her to find her own voice; (3) a desire to tell the young version of Cohen ‘don’t lay it on so thick, we know that you know what affect you have on women’; (4) sad desire. I haven’t watched that CBC interview for years.

That September in Montreal I was still fresh as the blue sky and green copper on the Catholic Church spires, bright as the red rust down by the port. I’d heard it before, of course  this Montreal I consumed hungrily in those first weeks I walked around the city  in my English college bedroom, through the Leonard Cohen songs that seeped out from under my door until the Estonian boy down the corridor complained. That had been June. Here I was autumnally now a European gasping at a new world  adulthood, like the sight of land from a ship.

I walked up and down Mount Royal as its neon cross worked like a magnet on my precipice-of-self heart. I walked up and down the streets that had French road signs that, in France, they write in English: Arret not Stop. I found ridiculous symmetries in everything, 22-year old-ishly. The old and over-varnished Yiddish shop signs were speaking to the new Vietnamese take-away without me translating. The mouth of the port and the tip of Mount Royal were speaking to each other. The Catholic Church spires and the synagogues were speaking to each other. I was speaking the awkward English-schoolgirl French of Europeans at un-impressed Quebecois locals who took pity on me as I struggled at late-night kiosks, buying my first packet of Belmont cigarettes with currency that felt like Euros and from which Queen Elizabeth’s familiar face stared out imperiously. 

I read books in bed about the Quiet Revolution and the novels of Mordechai Richler. I believed everything everyone told me about Montreal whenever someone started a conversation with me in a café. The city dominated talk and thoughts, this secret grotto and grubby sanctuary, a smuggled gem that sometimes, in my 22-year old mind, sort of spoke port-to-port to Naples and Marseilles  an under-ocean thread of swearing Latin sailors, transacted in ships’-bellies – and other times seemed a sister-city to New Orleans  secret America under America, coded in liturgy and a sponge of sacred curses, extravagantly mythologising itself.   And all anyone wanted to talk to me about was Montreal. Montreal Montréal! You could write it with or without an accent  what a city; double-city. Did you know Montreal has a bagel war with New York? I wanted to know many facts like this  as in love with Montreal as the city was, it later darkly emerged, in an aching kind of love with itself. But particularly I wanted to know one fact: where would I find Leonard?

Okay there were signs, when I asked that, that they had heard it all before. But to the 23, 24, 25-year old fully-formed impossibly-composed new friends to whom I made these enquiries, it was alright. Music was one of Montreal’s mythologies in which we all participated. It was 2007, a Montreal moment. Do you want to come and see the church where Arcade Fire recorded their first album, one new friend asked. Do you want to come back to mine to listen to The Stills? Do you want to come and see this new band you haven’t heard of? We went to see Bjork play  her song ‘Declare Independence’, new that year, set off a wave of Quebec-nationalist cheers in the audience that I needed someone to translate for me. We went on picnics  right through to October. Like we had all the time in the world for picnics.

For although Montreal has four full seasons, there was a further axis, over English-French, around which I had to contort my young and new-found freedom: summer-winter. I look back on those September days now through the glazed-window of what came later  evenings of rose wine and port-meandering buried forever beneath the winter I’ll never forget. When people warned me of the winter when I first arrived I thought they meant coldness, weather.  It turns out, though, they meant timeless moonwalking heartbreak.

The friendships we made in the autumn, post-college groups made for going to parties, to the cinema and into too much detail too quickly, constricted like oesophagi as the snow set in.  Sometime in late autumn a new friend who had grown up in Montreal explained to me that he had ‘summer friends’ and ‘winter friends’.  Summer friends lived in other areas of town, you met up with them for Frisbee and open-air jazz and trips out of town. Winter friends you wintered with. Wintering felt a bit like how my friends who liked to live in the heat described their months on kibbutz, or a bit like marriage or a bit like American graduate school. Getting through Montreal winter with other people (you could not get through Montreal winter alone  although, also, everyone got through Montreal winter alone) was less friendship than folie a deux. Or trois. There were three people in our apartment and three regular visitors. 

In autumn I’d moved into the building just off Rue St Denis which, I was told as an extravagant mythology, had been a brothel in the eighteenth century. It had stairs leading up to the front from the outside, just like I’d English-ly dreamed of. Every morning I had to throw salt on the ice-covered stairs so I didn’t break my neck. This, I found out, is how Montreal breaks your heart.

As the snow set in, in those first weeks, time still worked and the novelty of snowfights and Montreal mythology buoyed us through numb-toed drunken stumblings back from the Casa del Popolo bar. In the weeks that followed, time got snowed in too. I’d ask my warm-faced, wrapped-up flatmate whether he’d mind being the one to go out today, to pick my books up from our friend two streets away. He asked me two days later if I’d be the one to go out and buy more gritted salt. Evenings were wide as the prairies I had never seen — would never see, now that time had stopped and the concept of westwards was covered over with the moonscape of the city that we watched from our windows. We really did watch from our windows.

We listened to the Arcade Fire song ‘Une Année Sans Lumière’ with no discernible sense of irony. We played things on vinyl, because we were 22 and thought we were the first people to appreciate a variety of things, including wooden floors and theories of translation and our old telephone. Our landlord from upstairs would ring the phone at unsociable hours because all hours were unsociable and speak Quebecois French that I brain-translated into my-French then brain-translated into English and I have no idea what it meant but I think it meant, “Are you cold?”

We called into work or university sick or university or work called into us sick  let’s just not move, either way. We made a lot of fried eggs and took it in turns to moonwalk out to the dépanneur two blocks away for cigarettes. I wore my yellow knitted socks and my pink silk dress and my grey woollen jumper and had my first encounter with the brain-dentistry of clinical depression. Once we didn’t leave the apartment for three days. The experience snowily, sleepily dusted all surfaces of human interactions  at breakfast: “We haven’t left the apartment for a week!” This was conversational exaggeration and at the same time possibly true.

Because we were twenty-two, we read a lot of books self-consciously and some sincerely, and talked about them as we cooked terrible food. People fell into morbid, miserable love affairs of the kind that can only happen when you are enclosed in a room with a person with minus-twenty on the thermometer. We listened to jazz, blues, 1990s triphop, Broken Social Scene. But underneath it all was Leonard Cohen, the ache for him, the presence of him, the absence of him. We didn’t actually listen to him that much  not the way I had a year before, when ‘So Long Marianne’ and ‘Anthem’ and his album Dear Heather which had my name so it was fate of course (a twenty-one year old thought) filled my college bedroom. There was not much point actually taking the lid off him while in the thick of his shadow. We listened to everything in the mood of him instead.

I skipped a season here: if I can go back to autumn  which I can’t  there was a time in my early Montreal months when I walked up and down around Rue Rachel, thinking of the moment I would meet him. Cohen had lived in California for years, cloistered in Buddhism and late-celebrity, but there were extravagant rumours about his periodic migration back north. His migration back home, surely, for Leonard  to his Westmount childhood and McGill student fumblings, somewhere between the time he was Leonard Cohen and when he became ‘Leonard Cohen’.  

It finally hit me the third time I found myself waiting outside his mythologised local newsagent in Parc du Portgual. I saw the other girls who were looking for him, waiting. A French girl in a skirt, another girl in jeans and a red coat. And through them I saw, too, the historiography of Cohen, the decades there must have been of women walking up and down these streets, looking for him. Decades like sedentary layers of moon-surface Montreal  the women who had come from Winnipeg and St. John’s, women who had come even from New York and from Europe. The dust of Leonard. The weight of dreams of girls from eras where marriage was creeping up, was stalled, was receding. Even in the later decades of this line I imagined, of Leonard-longing girls, there was something burning in the thought of their dreams melting, get on the bus go home become an adult. I wasn’t ready to accept its inevitability yet, but the image of the line of those who’d come before me pressed itself into the thoughts I carried through the streets. I stopped looking for him after that, sickened the way a 22-year old is at the realization that they are a footnote to a stronger story.

Back in the apartment, though, we always returned to Leonard  his early poetry as a McGill student, that post-war open-mouth shock of young men whose thoughts are full of Eichmann, and then his love poetry preceding  precipitating, I liked to think  the sexual revolution. His first novel of young-man Montreal, his second novel of still-young man desire. A lot of people don’t know Leonard Cohen was a novelist before he became a songwriter; everyone I met in Montreal did. We read the writers who inspired him, were inspired by him  A.M. Klein, Irving Layton, an enclosed Montreal dialogue. The rest of the world hadn’t heard of them; Montreal didn’t care.

And then I felt the second haunting, in the second-half of winter. The ache I felt at the thought of all those years’-worth of young women who had come to this city hungry for the love of him was answered  or mirrored  in the swollen presence, suddenly, of all the men who were not Leonard Cohen.  There were so many men who were not Leonard Cohen here. I knew this because I used to notice them as I walked up and down Rue St Denis looking for his face on every figure  you’re not Leonard, you’re not Leonard, you’re not Leonard. I thought of all the men in this city straining under the weight of not-being-Leonard, of listening to his music as they kissed girls, lyrically cuckholded. I pictured entire marriages conducted in the shadow of his poetry. Those girls who’d come to Montreal on buses from Winnipeg and St John’s and New Jersey and wherever else in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s  did they find not-Leonards, close-enoughs, and settle down? 

Leonard loomed over us like grandfather time, like the neon cross on Mount Royal, like the snow-unfurling skies. I listened as the young man who was one of our ‘winter-friends’ and lived three streets away  that is, we were in Montreal-love and deluded and snow-psychotic together  told me at some hourless dinner in our sealed-off apartment how he sometimes narrated his thoughts entirely through Cohen lyrics, and navigated the city the times he numbly ventured out by reference to Cohen-points. We were all echoes, marginalia to someone else’s golden burning life. I realised lazily over a month into winter that my friends were tightrope-walking between depression and delusion the way that, in the city, you turned the corner and the language on people’s mouths suddenly changed from French to English. The boys had started waking up at 6 p.m., cooking meals then throwing them straight in the bin, reading the same book twice. This is one of the last things I lucidly noticed. 

Because it was just after that that my own delusion set in. It was about spring. Spring, I decided, was never coming. I tried to explain it to my housemate when I was going to bed and he was waking up at 3 a.m., in the kitchen full of books and the residue of omelettes. This was it, I said with the calmness of someone who has laid in bed with a book for a week. It would stay winter forever. The seasons decided to stop. I decided to stop.  At some point my flatmate took me aside through the fog of the window-staring sadness and told me he thought I should call my family. “I think you’re not well, Heather,” he said.

So I didn’t make it to spring, and for all I know it doesn’t ever come, or something miraculous happens that I’ll never know, to make it stop being the way it was like the moon or pre-history during those fogs of weeks.  I went back to England and asked people not to ask me about what had happened in Montreal. But I did finally see Leonard Cohen, I think. It was one of the early nights of Hannukah and I was walking to this bar not far from my apartment. I was moving so fast, like he sings in ‘My Secret Life’. This was the moment I’d been dreaming of — he’d see me, he’d notice me, I would become stitched into song. I overtook him on the street before I knew it was him, turned around just by chance and saw it — his Leonard-face, those two deep lines either side of his mouth that he’s always had, that you can see on the cover of The Songs of Leonard Cohen.  

But it was all wrong.  Because that night, for once, I had somewhere to be and other thoughts. I was going to a bar to meet my friend from three streets away and my thoughts were full of him, a real person in my real 22-year old life. I suppose it is a victory, for the not-Leonards who have for so long lived in his shadow, that at the moment I saw the singer himself turning the corner, his brow furrowed, scarf-wrapped, in his Pablo Neruda hat, I was thinking about another man.

One of my favourite Leonard Cohen lyrics is when he sings to Janis Joplin at the end of ‘Chelsea Hotel No 2’ – “That’s all, I don’t even think of you that often.”  I don’t think of that winter often. But when I do it is not Leonard Cohen that I think about, but all the not-Leonards trying to be and to make, faltering in their apprenticeship as I faltered in mine, in that first failed venture out into the world. When I meet 22-year olds in college bars in England, I think of them there in the snow  unfamous and without the magic power to make everyone fall in love with them through their words. I either love them so much or at least want, so much, to love them so much, for getting through the winter without being Leonard. Human and clumsy and with no magic powers, they are almost as defenceless as girls. 

Heather McRobie is the senior contributor to This Recording. She is a writer and journalist living in Oxford. She twitters here. 

"Chase the Light" - Palace (mp3)

"Settle Down" - Palace (mp3)

Tuesday
Mar262013

In Which We Winter In Montreal

Night Comes On

by HEATHER MCROBIE

When I was speaking to some twenty-two year olds in a university bar in England last week I made sure I was kind, in a 27-year old way, to their post-college references: F. Scott and whiskey, blank-canvas silent female icons who the 27-year old female knows are more than conduits for the male imagination. I didn’t say “I’ve heard this before” or even make a face that said it, the way people do to the young. This is not only because I spent a year in my twenties being laughed at unkindly by people five years older than I was. It’s because I remember my own post-college precipice of self, and I did more than just quote a few obvious reference-points. Twenty-two years old was the year I moved from England to Montreal to make Leonard Cohen fall in love with me.

“I’ve heard this before” didn’t come for a while, five years ago  even though thinking back everything I was doing was beyond-obvious. It didn’t come through all of September. There is an old CBC interview of a precipice-of-self Leonard Cohen in the 1960s, where he is shedding the snake-skin of ‘poet’ for ‘singer’ and blitzkreig’ing the CBC interviewer with pre-feminist-revolution charm. He claims with a faux-boldness reserved for male poets that he’s going to change his name to ‘September’. Watch the interview on Youtube if you want to feel all these feelings at once: (1) desire; (2) a feminist urge to reclaim the mid-1960s cardigan-wearing interviewer from the role of nervous, obedient good-girl being teased by the heroic subversive man, encourage her to find her own voice; (3) a desire to tell the young version of Cohen ‘don’t lay it on so thick, we know that you know what affect you have on women’; (4) sad desire. I haven’t watched that CBC interview for years.

That September in Montreal I was still fresh as the blue sky and green copper on the Catholic Church spires, bright as the red rust down by the port. I’d heard it before, of course  this Montreal I consumed hungrily in those first weeks I walked around the city  in my English college bedroom, through the Leonard Cohen songs that seeped out from under my door until the Estonian boy down the corridor complained. That had been June. Here I was autumnally now a European gasping at a new world  adulthood, like the sight of land from a ship.

I walked up and down Mount Royal as its neon cross worked like a magnet on my precipice-of-self heart. I walked up and down the streets that had French road signs that, in France, they write in English: Arret not Stop. I found ridiculous symmetries in everything, 22-year old-ishly. The old and over-varnished Yiddish shop signs were speaking to the new Vietnamese take-away without me translating. The mouth of the port and the tip of Mount Royal were speaking to each other. The Catholic Church spires and the synagogues were speaking to each other. I was speaking the awkward English-schoolgirl French of Europeans at un-impressed Quebecois locals who took pity on me as I struggled at late-night kiosks, buying my first packet of Belmont cigarettes with currency that felt like Euros and from which Queen Elizabeth’s familiar face stared out imperiously. 

I read books in bed about the Quiet Revolution and the novels of Mordechai Richler. I believed everything everyone told me about Montreal whenever someone started a conversation with me in a café. The city dominated talk and thoughts, this secret grotto and grubby sanctuary, a smuggled gem that sometimes, in my 22-year old mind, sort of spoke port-to-port to Naples and Marseilles  an under-ocean thread of swearing Latin sailors, transacted in ships’-bellies – and other times seemed a sister-city to New Orleans  secret America under America, coded in liturgy and a sponge of sacred curses, extravagantly mythologising itself.   And all anyone wanted to talk to me about was Montreal. Montreal Montréal! You could write it with or without an accent  what a city; double-city. Did you know Montreal has a bagel war with New York? I wanted to know many facts like this  as in love with Montreal as the city was, it later darkly emerged, in an aching kind of love with itself. But particularly I wanted to know one fact: where would I find Leonard?

Okay there were signs, when I asked that, that they had heard it all before. But to the 23, 24, 25-year old fully-formed impossibly-composed new friends to whom I made these enquiries, it was alright. Music was one of Montreal’s mythologies in which we all participated. It was 2007, a Montreal moment. Do you want to come and see the church where Arcade Fire recorded their first album, one new friend asked. Do you want to come back to mine to listen to The Stills? Do you want to come and see this new band you haven’t heard of? We went to see Bjork play  her song ‘Declare Independence’, new that year, set off a wave of Quebec-nationalist cheers in the audience that I needed someone to translate for me. We went on picnics  right through to October. Like we had all the time in the world for picnics.

For although Montreal has four full seasons, there was a further axis, over English-French, around which I had to contort my young and new-found freedom: summer-winter. I look back on those September days now through the glazed-window of what came later  evenings of rose wine and port-meandering buried forever beneath the winter I’ll never forget. When people warned me of the winter when I first arrived I thought they meant coldness, weather.  It turns out, though, they meant timeless moonwalking heartbreak.

The friendships we made in the autumn, post-college groups made for going to parties, to the cinema and into too much detail too quickly, constricted like oesophagi as the snow set in.  Sometime in late autumn a new friend who had grown up in Montreal explained to me that he had ‘summer friends’ and ‘winter friends’.  Summer friends lived in other areas of town, you met up with them for Frisbee and open-air jazz and trips out of town. Winter friends you wintered with. Wintering felt a bit like how my friends who liked to live in the heat described their months on kibbutz, or a bit like marriage or a bit like American graduate school. Getting through Montreal winter with other people (you could not get through Montreal winter alone  although, also, everyone got through Montreal winter alone) was less friendship than folie a deux. Or trois. There were three people in our apartment and three regular visitors. 

In autumn I’d moved into the building just off Rue St Denis which, I was told as an extravagant mythology, had been a brothel in the eighteenth century. It had stairs leading up to the front from the outside, just like I’d English-ly dreamed of. Every morning I had to throw salt on the ice-covered stairs so I didn’t break my neck. This, I found out, is how Montreal breaks your heart.

As the snow set in, in those first weeks, time still worked and the novelty of snowfights and Montreal mythology buoyed us through numb-toed drunken stumblings back from the Casa del Popolo bar. In the weeks that followed, time got snowed in too. I’d ask my warm-faced, wrapped-up flatmate whether he’d mind being the one to go out today, to pick my books up from our friend two streets away. He asked me two days later if I’d be the one to go out and buy more gritted salt. Evenings were wide as the prairies I had never seen — would never see, now that time had stopped and the concept of westwards was covered over with the moonscape of the city that we watched from our windows. We really did watch from our windows.

We listened to the Arcade Fire song ‘Une Année Sans Lumière’ with no discernible sense of irony. We played things on vinyl, because we were 22 and thought we were the first people to appreciate a variety of things, including wooden floors and theories of translation and our old telephone. Our landlord from upstairs would ring the phone at unsociable hours because all hours were unsociable and speak Quebecois French that I brain-translated into my-French then brain-translated into English and I have no idea what it meant but I think it meant, “Are you cold?” We called into work or university sick or university or work called into us sick  let’s just not move, either way. We made a lot of fried eggs and took it in turns to moonwalk out to the dépanneur two blocks away for cigarettes. I wore my yellow knitted socks and my pink silk dress and my grey woollen jumper and had my first encounter with the brain-dentistry of clinical depression. Once we didn’t leave the apartment for three days. The experience snowily, sleepily dusted all surfaces of human interactions  at breakfast: “We haven’t left the apartment for a week!” This was conversational exaggeration and at the same time possibly true.

Because we were twenty-two, we read a lot of books self-consciously and some sincerely, and talked about them as we cooked terrible food. People fell into morbid, miserable love affairs of the kind that can only happen when you are enclosed in a room with a person with minus-twenty on the thermometer. We listened to jazz, blues, 1990s triphop, Broken Social Scene. But underneath it all was Leonard Cohen, the ache for him, the presence of him, the absence of him. We didn’t actually listen to him that much  not the way I had a year before, when ‘So Long Marianne’ and ‘Anthem’ and his album Dear Heather which had my name so it was fate of course (a twenty-one year old thought) filled my college bedroom. There was not much point actually taking the lid off him while in the thick of his shadow. We listened to everything in the mood of him instead.

I skipped a season here: if I can go back to autumn  which I can’t  there was a time in my early Montreal months when I walked up and down around Rue Rachel, thinking of the moment I would meet him. Cohen had lived in California for years, cloistered in Buddhism and late-celebrity, but there were extravagant rumours about his periodic migration back north. His migration back home, surely, for Leonard  to his Westmount childhood and McGill student fumblings, somewhere between the time he was Leonard Cohen and when he became ‘Leonard Cohen’.  

It finally hit me the third time I found myself waiting outside his mythologised local newsagent in Parc du Portgual. I saw the other girls who were looking for him, waiting. A French girl in a skirt, another girl in jeans and a red coat. And through them I saw, too, the historiography of Cohen, the decades there must have been of women walking up and down these streets, looking for him. Decades like sedentary layers of moon-surface Montreal  the women who had come from Winnipeg and St. John’s, women who had come even from New York and from Europe. The dust of Leonard. The weight of dreams of girls from eras where marriage was creeping up, was stalled, was receding. Even in the later decades of this line I imagined, of Leonard-longing girls, there was something burning in the thought of their dreams melting, get on the bus go home become an adult. I wasn’t ready to accept its inevitability yet, but the image of the line of those who’d come before me pressed itself into the thoughts I carried through the streets. I stopped looking for him after that, sickened the way a 22-year old is at the realization that they are a footnote to a stronger story.

Back in the apartment, though, we always returned to Leonard  his early poetry as a McGill student, that post-war open-mouth shock of young men whose thoughts are full of Eichmann, and then his love poetry preceding  precipitating, I liked to think  the sexual revolution. His first novel of young-man Montreal, his second novel of still-young man desire. A lot of people don’t know Leonard Cohen was a novelist before he became a songwriter; everyone I met in Montreal did. We read the writers who inspired him, were inspired by him  A.M. Klein, Irving Layton, an enclosed Montreal dialogue. The rest of the world hadn’t heard of them; Montreal didn’t care.

And then I felt the second haunting, in the second-half of winter. The ache I felt at the thought of all those years’-worth of young women who had come to this city hungry for the love of him was answered  or mirrored  in the swollen presence, suddenly, of all the men who were not Leonard Cohen.  There were so many men who were not Leonard Cohen here. I knew this because I used to notice them as I walked up and down Rue St Denis looking for his face on every figure  you’re not Leonard, you’re not Leonard, you’re not Leonard. I thought of all the men in this city straining under the weight of not-being-Leonard, of listening to his music as they kissed girls, lyrically cuckholded. I pictured entire marriages conducted in the shadow of his poetry. Those girls who’d come to Montreal on buses from Winnipeg and St John’s and New Jersey and wherever else in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s  did they find not-Leonards, close-enoughs, and settle down? 

Leonard loomed over us like grandfather time, like the neon cross on Mount Royal, like the snow-unfurling skies. I listened as the young man who was one of our ‘winter-friends’ and lived three streets away  that is, we were in Montreal-love and deluded and snow-psychotic together  told me at some hourless dinner in our sealed-off apartment how he sometimes narrated his thoughts entirely through Cohen lyrics, and navigated the city the times he numbly ventured out by reference to Cohen-points. We were all echoes, marginalia to someone else’s golden burning life. I realised lazily over a month into winter that my friends were tightrope-walking between depression and delusion the way that, in the city, you turned the corner and the language on people’s mouths suddenly changed from French to English. The boys had started waking up at 6 p.m., cooking meals then throwing them straight in the bin, reading the same book twice. This is one of the last things I lucidly noticed.

Because it was just after that that my own delusion set in. It was about spring. Spring, I decided, was never coming. I tried to explain it to my housemate when I was going to bed and he was waking up at 3 a.m., in the kitchen full of books and the residue of omelettes. This was it, I said with the calmness of someone who has laid in bed with a book for a week. It would stay winter forever. The seasons decided to stop. I decided to stop.  At some point my flatmate took me aside through the fog of the window-staring sadness and told me he thought I should call my family. “I think you’re not well, Heather,” he said.

So I didn’t make it to spring, and for all I know it doesn’t ever come, or something miraculous happens that I’ll never know, to make it stop being the way it was like the moon or pre-history during those fogs of weeks.  I went back to England and asked people not to ask me about what had happened in Montreal. But I did finally see Leonard Cohen, I think. It was one of the early nights of Hannukah and I was walking to this bar not far from my apartment. I was moving so fast, like he sings in ‘My Secret Life’. This was the moment I’d been dreaming of — he’d see me, he’d notice me, I would become stitched into song. I overtook him on the street before I knew it was him, turned around just by chance and saw it — his Leonard-face, those two deep lines either side of his mouth that he’s always had, that you can see on the cover of The Songs of Leonard Cohen.  

But it was all wrong.  Because that night, for once, I had somewhere to be and other thoughts. I was going to a bar to meet my friend from three streets away and my thoughts were full of him, a real person in my real 22-year old life. I suppose it is a victory, for the not-Leonards who have for so long lived in his shadow, that at the moment I saw the singer himself turning the corner, his brow furrowed, scarf-wrapped, in his Pablo Neruda hat, I was thinking about another man.

One of my favourite Leonard Cohen lyrics is when he sings to Janis Joplin at the end of ‘Chelsea Hotel No 2’ – “That’s all, I don’t even think of you that often.”  I don’t think of that winter often. But when I do it is not Leonard Cohen that I think about, but all the not-Leonards trying to be and to make, faltering in their apprenticeship as I faltered in mine, in that first failed venture out into the world. When I meet 22-year olds in college bars in England, I think of them there in the snow  unfamous and without the magic power to make everyone fall in love with them through their words. I either love them so much or at least want, so much, to love them so much, for getting through the winter without being Leonard. Human and clumsy and with no magic powers, they are almost as defenceless as girls. 

Heather McRobie is a contributor to This Recording. She is a writer living in Oxford. This is her first appearance in these pages. She twitters here. 

"Anthems for a Seventeen-Year-Old Girl" - Broken Social Scene (mp3)

"Lover's Spit" - Broken Social Scene (mp3)

Wednesday
Apr292009

In Which The Future Is But The Obsolete In Reverse

Altman Among the “New Monuments”

by HARRIS FEINSOD

Consider the goose. Does he know where he is going? Or does he just fly
into the unknown?

— Paul Newman, Quintet (1979).

The flight of birds. The flight of man. Man’s similarity to birds. Bird’s
similarity to man. These are the subjects at hand, and we will deal
with them for the next hour or so and hope that we draw no conclusions,
elsewise the subject will cease to fascinate us and alas another
dream would be lost there are far too few.

— Rene Auberjonois, Brewster McCloud (1970).

Ever since Paul Newman passed away I have been slowly paddling my way upriver into his filmographic interior. This is rough country but it has some exploitable resources, such as John Huston’s The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean (1971). Quintet, on the other hand—Robert Altman’s monumental 1979 sci-fi failure—is not among the Newman vehicles particularly primed for rediscovery. It is the dank Kurtzian cave where the Imperial Enterprise of Paul Newman loses it. In the offing, it even redeems the unendurable Towering Inferno (1974), Newman’s blockbuster turn as a starchitect who teems up with fireman Steve McQueen to save his latest skyscraper (and the rich people inside) from an opening night blaze.

Altman, Newman.But surely Quintet, or any Altman/Newman collaboration, would be an interesting failure at worst, wouldn’t it? No matter that its reviewers were right to lampoon Quintet for its naked pretension (this is the period when Altman’s career came off the rails due, in part, to a belief that his creative genius would make anything cohere). Unlike many plotless-yet-frenetic Altman features, the pace here is as leaden as Tarkovsky. Characters are driven by alien motives. Their world is meaningless, and nothing incites a film critic to judgment like the auteur embracing his nihilism too dotingly. Still, there must be something to it. It must know something about its own time and place that it wants me to know too. My popcorn-inhaling roommates finish their Redenbacher and bail on Quintet after twenty minutes. But the die is cast. I will try to squeeze some honey from the rock.

Quintet opens with the seal hunter Essex (Newman) and his wife Vivia (Brigitte Fossey) loping over a vast desert of packed snow in an ice age of the future. The exilic couple is suddenly arrested by the rare sight of a lone Canada goose flying a northerly route, and we learn that the film will be full of augurs and omens, although it lacks a cosmology that facilitates signifying relationships between signs and meanings. Essex and Vivia pass trains frozen to the tracks, the first machines in a Great Tartary of abandoned, futuristic infrastructure, where packs of rottweilers scavenge on human corpses, as they will do throughout the remainder of the film. The couple comes to a sparsely peopled city (filmed in the ruins of the Montreal Expo of ’67) on their way to find Essex’s estranged brother, where they woodenly dialogue over a dead body:

Vivia: “Shouldn’t we help him? He’s gonna freeze to death.”
Essex: “He already has.”
Vivia: “I’m so tired of walking.”
Essex: “It’s not far.”
Vivia: “And what if he’s not there?”
Essex: “We’ll face that when we get there.”
Vivia: “I’m hungry.”

This ice age is irreversible and total. Formally, Altman insists on this fact by shooting through a lens smeared at the edges with Vaseline, as though the viewer’s eye were hoary with frost, a cinematic gag best used to create the oneiric fantasy world of the Penthouse centerfold. The film’s commentators have pointed out this trivium above all others.

What malady has befallen earth? As Grigor—one of the film’s many conspiratorial Priest-Musketeers—puts it, “There is nothing but water, and soon that’s all that will be left. The planet will be frozen in an envelope of ice. And that will mercifully be the end of this history.” This kind of certain doom means that we are in for a tragic drama where human action is over-determined by survival, chance, and gamesmanship. Throats are unceremoniously slit with straight razors and letter openers. In fact, the only thing anyone does in this world is to play the titular board game—Quintet—something like “Old Maid with death penalties,” as a perspicacious New York Times reviewer put it.

Wife Vivia, five months pregnant (the Children of Men scenario, as female barrenness is rife in this world) is an early victim of Quintet-death, exploded by a bomb during a game. Essex carries her body from the wreckage and pushes the lifeless form into a rushing river to float downstream. Nonexistent pathos. Now Essex, without pause to mourn, will be sucked into the vortex of the board game for the rest of the film, forging delicate alliances and betrayals, while cultivating a kind of ice-age ennui that exceeds all French paradigms for disaffection and detachment. Quintet preludes Schwarzenegger’s Running Man, another future world dominated by chance games of life and death, but unlike Running Man it is drained of action and spectacle.

In fact, the picture follows a predictable enough logic despite all its existential draftiness. Or two logics, working in counterpoint. The first—the logic of apocalypse—was legitimately new territory for Altman and Newman both, not that they handle it with any sensitivity. But the second—the logic of gambling—was hardly novel to either of these career sharps. By 1979, Altman had directed McCabe and Mrs. Miller and California Split. Newman had acted in The Hustler and The Sting. As soon as Essex first sits down at a cold Quintet table, we could easily be in the frigid Northwest barroom of McCabe and Mrs. Miller. Some of the sartorial choices--turbans jar with Russian orthodox pendants and conquistador chic—transform the bizarre, languorous casino scenes where Quintet is played into a kind of Star Wars souk peopled by Barfly extras, but the jangle of coins and chips, and cacophonous dialogue bounding around the table like a roulette ball locates us clearly in an Altman film.

Instead, the setting is the real story of Quintet. The dilapidated Montreal Expo set (preeminently the “Man and His World” pavilion) is the only compelling thing here. It’s ability to provoke a total feeling of stasis obtains to what the Italian poet Giuseppe Ungaretti called “il languore / di un circo / prima o dopo lo spettacolo” (“the languor of a circus before or after the show”). At one point, Essex (now disguised as “Redstone”) visits a dangerous enemy named “St. Christopher,” who preaches from a pedestal below the sign “The earth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot live in the cradle forever.” The quote is from the Soviet rocket scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovskii, and was a remnant left among the ruins of the Montreal Expo. The suggestion here, that outer space is humankind’s natural destiny, does not betoken a brave future but an aborted one. Huge black and white posters of African children have the same effect. Like Dawn of the Dead, this is a world of busted escalators that lead toward ransacked display windows, not distant terra-formed planets.

“Man the Explorer” Pavilion. Buckminster Fuller’s Geodesic Dome in background.Because the Expo pavilions were such utopian emblems of futurity, their dilapidation evokes the abortion of the future rather than the ruins of a once-vital present. It is a world whose utopia has been designed too fast for human inhabitation but slower than the pace of obsolescence. Artist Robert Smithson, a year before the Expo, had presciently described this phenomenon as being the common feature of science fiction and contemporary architecture in the late 1960s. In an essay entitled “Entropy and the New Monuments,” Smithson wrote that the conceptual art of the mid-1960s indulged in

what Flavin calls ‘inactive history’ or what the physicist calls
‘entropy’ or ‘energy-drain.’ They bring to mind the Ice Age
rather than the Golden Age, and would most likely confirm
Vladimir Nabokov's observation that, ‘The future is but the obsolete
in reverse.’ In a rather round-about way, many of the artists have
provided a visible analog for the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
which extrapolates the range of entropy by telling us energy is
more easily lost than obtained, and that in the ultimate future the
whole universe will burn out and be transformed into an all-
encompassing sameness.

Smithson, “A Non-Site”, Pine Barrens, New Jersey, 1968

Going on, Smithson remarked, “Instead of causing us to remember the past like the old monuments, the new monuments seem to cause us to forget the future.” Quintet, sadly, never achieves a critique of that monstrous, forgotten future. Rather, it is satisfied with a sadistic romanticism of it. We are not turned into Shelley’s traveler at Ozymandias, made small by a great sphinx-like speaking monument of history:

"My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
Nothing beside remains: round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away.


Rather, watching Quintet is to be put in the position of a hapless Justine, dulled by the eons, still chancing on that strange castle or abbey that holds in store a world of unmotivated pain. And that is finally where the vaseline-smeared lens becomes legible. The movie has the artistic trappings of pornography, and all of pornography’s indulgent boredom, but none of its baser pleasures.

Montreal Olympic StadiumAs for Quintet’s great theme of the “New Monuments” to the aborted future, this was simultaneously enacted by a Montreal baseball franchise, the Expos, who were born in 1969 in the wake of the Expo, and who ended up playing in the Olympic Stadium built for the ’76 Olympics, which was not actually completed until 1990. By 2004, the Expos franchise had moved to Washington D.C.

But Altman had already handled the stadium-politic ironies far more deftly in his feature Brewster McCloud (1970), about a teenager living in a fallout shelter beneath the Houston Astrodome where he is building a pair of wings in order to fly.

Sadly, Brewster McCloud is one of the few Altman pictures that isn’t on DVD, and while it has its charm on VHS, it is inexplicable that Beyond Therapy is readily available and this is not.

The film’s opening lecture by an erudite educator claims—less than a year after the first moon landing—that man’s dream of flight has not yet been achieved because the dream has been misinterpreted. The true dream has to do with a gloss on Goethe: “How I yearn to throw myself into endless space and float above the awful abyss.” Bud Cort (who was about to become Harold of Harold & Maude) will be the interpreter of this desire for true avian freedom, though he is fated for Icarian disappointment.

As the camera pans out over the Astrodome, the “lecturer” offers a reflection that directly prophesizes the Biosphere and—along with it—Pauly Shore’s Biodome: “It may someday be necessary to build enormous environmental enclosures to protect both man and birds. But, if so, it is questionable whether man will allow birds in—or out—as the case may be.”

The film is awash in a baroque excess of ornithological details, and the camera constantly zooms or wanders onto public statuary of winged figures, bird cages, bird baths, and so on. The film is bird kitsch. Avian schtick. It also features the first of many beautifully chatty, doe-eyed performances by Shelley Duvall, who leads “9 mile” tours inside the Astrodome. Then there is “Shaft,” a cop flown in from San Francisco to investigate a series of strangulations associated with people who try to stand in the way of Brewster’s goals, and the cop is a pitch-perfect parody of Steve McQueen in Bullitt. These murders have all been perpetrated by Louise (Sally Kellerman), who plays Brewster’s vexatious fairy godmother, flame-keeper of his dream and something like Pinocchio’s Fairy with Turquoise Hair.

What links this film to Quintet? Well, we have to distend Smithson’s definition a bit here, but this also seems to be the land of The New Monuments. The Astrodome becomes a Mecca-like monument to the population boom in the Sun Belt through the engines of oil revenue, the military industrial complex, aerospace technology, and retirees. Nixon strategist Kevin Philips, in fact, coined the term “Sun-Belt” in The Emerging Republican Majority (1969) as a way of describing this important sea change in political demography.

Brewster McCloud is one of the many films that tried to imagine what it means to be a youth in this totally new world. It takes the institutions of the sun belt – aerospace, oil, suburbia, and so on – and tries to describe a quirky personal freedom committed to those institutions, just as one is committed to an asylum.

In this, it is a breezy stepbrother to Zabriskie Point or Five Easy Pieces, and it offers whimsy enough for Wes Anderson’s Rushmore to mine and for Altman to revisit in the vastly underrated O.C. and Stiggs, while simultaneously doling out some of the malaise that threads from The Last Picture Show through Bad News Bears and Over the Edge.

This last film was Matt Dillon’s pre-Rumblefish turn as the most ferocious delinquent in a suburban Texas town full of them. They act out their righteous anger with drugs, guns, summer love, Ric Ocasek songs, and finally by locking their parents and teachers in the high school during an emergency PTA meeting and set the school aflame. It is a genre later wrangled into a period cliché by Dazed and Confused. However, despite Brewster McCloud’s distant gaze, there is something that makes him more eerily lucid than dazed or confused. He is a tragic rather than cautionary Icarus who, just like any young dreamer, wants to get out of Houston.

It will be no surprise that the film ends with what W.H. Auden, in his famous poem on Breughel’s Icarus, called “Something amazing, a boy falling out of the sky.” But Brewster’s death is not, as in Auden, the scene of worldy indifference (“everything turns away / Quite leisurely from the disaster”). Altman makes Brewster’s crash the opening of a carnivalesque set of credits with the entire cast appearing in a Ringling Brothers event surrounding Brewster’s avian exoskeleton. It is another aborted future that courts “the languor of the circus, before or after the show.”

Harris Feinsod lives in San Francisco.


digg reddit stumble facebook twitter subscribe

OAK ORCHARD SWAMP IS A BAND YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT

"Out of Doors" - Oak Orchard Swamp (mp3)

"Mercy" - Oak Orchard Swamp (mp3)

"That Old Vague Sick Feeling" - Oak Orchard Swamp (mp3)

"Oldest Friend" - Oak Orchard Swamp (mp3)

"Mi Lo" - Oak Orchard Swamp (mp3)

Tomorrow Tyler tackles this timeless treasure...