Quantcast

Video of the Day

Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Alex Carnevale
(e-mail/tumblr/twitter)

Features Editor
Mia Nguyen
(e-mail)

Reviews Editor
Ethan Peterson

This Recording

is dedicated to the enjoyment of audio and visual stimuli. Please visit our archives where we have uncovered the true importance of nearly everything. Should you want to reach us, e-mail alex dot carnevale at gmail dot com, but don't tell the spam robots. Consider contacting us if you wish to use This Recording in your classroom or club setting. We have given several talks at local Rotarys that we feel went really well.

Pretty used to being with Gwyneth

Regrets that her mother did not smoke

Frank in all directions

Jean Cocteau and Jean Marais

Simply cannot go back to them

Roll your eyes at Samuel Beckett

John Gregory Dunne and Joan Didion

Metaphors with eyes

Life of Mary MacLane

Circle what it is you want

Not really talking about women, just Diane

Felicity's disguise

Live and Active Affiliates
This area does not yet contain any content.

Entries in SEX (116)

Saturday
May302009

In Which We Get Bent

Be Gentle

by SARAH C. ROBERTS

As summer quickly creeps up on us, I'm reminded of naked people. And that I blog naked people. All the time. This brings me untold fame and recognition. Yeah, not at all. But it's become something of a hobby, as it certainly does not bring me any monetary gain.

Last August, I began to collect all the free porn I really enjoyed via tumblr and began to disseminate it through Bend Me Over. There was no real reason, I just didn't feel comfortable posting smut on my personal blog, so I created a collection and added a tagline.

I believe the secret to my success (traffic! traffic! traffic!) is my site description: "Bend Me Over... And fuck me hard. Please direct all inquiries, requests and offers of cock" to my e-mail address. Throughout the last 9 or so months, I've learned some lessons.

For one, photographers are a fickle lot.

The idea of a copyright via the internet is insane to me, but many people who take pictures do not take such a laissez-faire attitude to the distribution of their photos. Legal threats and pictures of penises rule my inbox.

For another, people are looking for someone to understand them. I get great requests such as, "You posted a great picture of a girl with a red bush, I love redheads, thanks so much for posting. Where I can find more ginger porn?"

Lots of e-mails I get are from men and women who just want me to know I made them very... happy. I see my blog as an interesting and exciting pastime and anytime someone really enjoys it I feel validated.

So my process and my purpose... As a straight lady-person, I look at these women who are voluptuous or slender, legs completely splayed or demurely crossed and I marvel at the beauty. I appreciate the just right curve of a hip, breast or ass and I am a lover of the simply scandalous and the outright bizarre.

The sweet embrace and the rough fucking. The intimate kiss of lovers and the gentle biting of cock. Nude and pornographic photos elicit a response in everyone and lately my response has changed. I've never been a fan of hardcore or derogatory images but I've begun to appreciate a more intimate element of photographs. A picture where a couple or an individual looks truly vulnerable and at the mercy of the moment are the hottest to post.

Staged, cheesy porn has a numbing effect on my loins and my mind. My main process is that I subscribe to hundreds of porn blogs and site feeds in my very full Google Reader and then I meticulously go through each feed to decide what is up to my relatively high standards.

The main question I ask myself for each photo I come across to ascertain whether it meets my standards:

Would I want to be in this picture? Does this intrigue me? Make me hunger for more? Beyond whether I want to hop into the pictures, I'm also really big on certain aesthetic issues: I hate fake tits. You can't be a stickler about these things, but I'm a big fan of women who proudly bare their double A's or their massive triple E's (a real size).

As a feminist, I worry about what I have chosen to do with my free time. I spend way too much time everyday looking at women in various stages of undress and I feel as if I'm betraying my strongly held views. Or am I really doing yeoman's work for the porn-feminism dichotomy? Neither of course. Porn can be oppressive or empowering depending on what it is and who's making it. I'm just posting it.

The most unfortunate side effect of this whole venture is when I tell people in my real life that I have this site, they generally assume I post pictures of myself. I can see how they got there, sure, but no, never. Be glad. Enjoy these naked ladies.

Sarah C. Roberts is the senior contributor to This Recording. She tumbles non-naked people here. She last wrote in these pages on the subject of the HBO series True Blood.

digg reddit stumble facebook twitter subscribe

"Graham Lewis and Our Struggle Against Fascism" - Dining with the Bolsheviks (mp3)

"Sometimes" - Dining with the Bolsheviks (mp3) highly recommended

"Sea of Love" - Dining with the Bolsheviks (mp3)

Dining with the Bolsheviks myspace

 

Wednesday
May272009

In Which We Can See It Through The Flap In His Pants

My Father's Penis

by NANCY K. MILLER

When I was growing up, my father wore what we used to call string pajamas. Actually, I only remember the bottom part of the pajamas, which, as their name might suggest, tied with a string at the waist. (On top he wore a ribbed sleeveless undershirt that tucked into the pajama bottoms.)

The pajamas, made of a thin cotton fabric, usually a shade of washed-out blue, but sometimes also striped, were a droopy affair; they tended to bag at the knees and shift position at the waist with every movement. The string, meant to hold the pajamas up, was also meant to keep the fly -- just a slit opening in the front -- closed. But the fly, we might say modernly, resisted closure and defined itself instead by the meaningful hint of a gap.

As my father wandered through the apartment in the early mornings, performing his domestic rituals (bringing my mother coffee in bed, making my sister and me breakfast in the kitchen, shaving, watering the plants), this almost gap never failed to catch my eye.

It seemed to me as I watched him cheerfully rescue the burning toast and pass from room to room in a slow motion of characteristic aimlessness (memorialized in our family codes by the Yiddish trope of draying), that behind the flap lay something important: dark, maybe verging on purple, probably soft and floppy. I also suspected it was hairy in there; I was pretty sure I had glimpsed hair (he had hair everywhere, on his back and shoulders, why not there).

I don't think I wanted to see it -- "it" had no name in my ruminations -- but there was a peculiar way in which its mysterious daily existence behind the slit in the pajama bottoms loomed large in my prepubescent imagination as somehow connected to the constant tension in our family, especially to my mother's bad moods.

Growing up, I had only the vaguest notions of sex; I can still remember my utter astonishment when, sitting on the living room couch and feeling vastly sophisticated, I learned from my mother that a penis had to become "erect" to enter a vagina (I had never really thought about how the man's penis -- in the redundant but always less than instructive language of hygiene classes -- gets into the woman's vagina). So that several years later when in college I finally had a look at my first penis (this was no small surprise), I realized I had never visualized the thing to myself at all.

Almost forty years after the scene of these memories, I find myself again, as a middle-aged therapized intellectual, thinking about my father's penis. Now, living alone after my mother's death in the same apartment, my father, stricken with Parkinson's disease shuffles through the room draying. Boxer shorts have replaced the string pajamas, but the gap remains the same and it's still dark in there. But it's not the same. I have seen his penis. I have even touched it. One day when his fingers had grown so rigid he couldn't, as he puts it, "snare" his penis, he wanted to get up to go to the bathroom. It was late and I wanted to go home, so looking and looking away, I fished his penis out from behind the fly of his shorts and stuck it in the urinal; it felt soft and a little clammy.

Shirley, the nurse's aide who takes care of my father, reported one day that when she arrived in the morning, she had found my father in the kitched "bare-bottomed" and cold. "His -- was blue," she said (the cadences of a slight Carribean accent made the word hard to understand over the phone); "I rubbed it until it turned pink. Then he felt better." Rubbed his penis? But what else, in the vicinity of a bare-bottom, of two syllables, could have gone from blue to pink? Did it respond to her rubbing? Become erect? The mystery returns, What do I know?

Shirley and I talk about my father, his care. The apartment, despite her efforts, smells of urine. There's no missing this penis-effect. One day, in the middle of eating dinner, his back to me, he demands his urinal from Shirley, which he uses while at the table. Shirley buys him new boxer shorts on 14th Street. Six dollars, she says. Apiece? I ask. No, three Fruit of the Looms to a package.

This is the condition of his remaining at home (he gaves me a pained look at the mention of going to a "home" that silences me): to get out of bed and make it to the bathroom without falling, or to use the urinal that hangs like a limp penis from the walker he despises (he shows his superiority to his infirmity by carrying the walker in front of him instead of leaning on it).

When these solutions fail, Ellen, the neighbor who brings him his daily New York Times, says "he peed himself" (my father always talks more elaborately about "the difficulty of urination," of responding in time to the "urgency of its call"). The newspapers now, like the New Yorkers to which he maintains his subscription, and which remain unopened in their plastic wrappers, pile up unread in the living room. I throw them away in my weekly sweep through the apartment.

In "Phallus/Penis: Same Difference" (great title) Jane Gallop writes: "The debate over Lacan's and beyond that, psychoanalysis's value for feminism itself centers on the phallus. Yet the phallus is a very complicated notion in Lacan, who distinguishes it from the penis. The distinction, however, seems to resist clarification." For awhile after touching my father's penis, I went around thinking smugly that I would never again confuse penis and phallus, boasting that I had transcended the confusion. Phallus was the way my father could terrify me when I was growing up: throwing me across the room in a blind rage because I had been talking on the phone -- endlessly, it's true -- when the hospital called to say his mother was dying; knocking me down in an elevator for staying out late one night with my college boyfriend. Phallus was tearing the pages out of the typewriter because I hadn't left wide enough margins on my term papers; making me break a date with a cab driver who had picked me up in London on my first visit there (but Daddy, he's Jewish, the son of a cantor!)

Penis was that dark-veined, heavy thing lying there against strangely elongated, even darker balls; hanging between emaciated but still elegant thighs. It made problems for me, but they were finally prosaic, unmediated by concepts and the symbolic order. My father doesn't have the phallus; no one does, Lacan said. But, Gallop writes in The Daughter's Seduction, "the need, the desire, the wish for the Phallus is great. No matter how oppressive its reign, it is much more comforting than no one in command." So now I decide, say no, and yell; I am responsible for the rest of his life ("it's for your health and welfare," he used to say as a his cover for the exercise of an arbitrary authority); maybe I, failing the penis, have my chance at the phallus.

Months after writing this, I come into my father's room. I think I have put an end to all these speculations (penis, phallus, castration, etc) but when I find him sleeping completely naked, stretched out like an aged Endymion across a hospital bed, I can't resist. His hand is resting in his lap, his penis tucked away out of sight, hidden between his thighs. I move closer. "So what does it look like?" my sister asks. I don't answer, not only because I want to play big sister one last time, because I'm not sure I can say what it is I've seen.

When I wrote "My Father's Penis", I had been thinking more about penises than fathers (or so I thought at the time). Mira Schor, who is a painter and a critic, had done a slide-show lecture on representations of the penis in painting, and I conceived my piece originally as a kind of footnote to her panoply of members -- the geriatric extension of her taxonomy. But I was also writing in the aftermath of an intensely charged academic performance in which the status of "experience" in feminist theory had been challenged with a certain phallic -- what would a better word be? -- insistence.

When it then became a matter of publishing "the penis" (it seems impossible to invoke the title or its contents without getting caught in the spiral of catachresis) in Refiguring the Father, I felt that I had inadvertently found a destination for it: that the fragmentary essay, because of its mixed origins, born of the troubled intimacies of the autobiographical penis and the theoretical phallus, had unexpectedly come full circle back to feminist revision. But not perhaps back home.

Had my father still been able to read, I would never have written about "the penis." By going public with the detials of domestic arrangements on Riverside Drive, I was flying in the face of the parental injunction not to "tell" that had haunted my adolescence and continued well into my adult years; the panic my parents felt that they would be exposed by us; the shame over family secrets. But he was down in his reading to the occassional newspaper headline and, I think, at his end, despite a finely honed personal vanity, beyond caring. He had become no longer himself, and I need to mourn his disappearance.

My father died before this piece appeared in print. He died, I'm tempted to say, of the penis: at home, as he had wanted, after eating ice cream and watching public television, in the aftermath of a grueling seven-week stay in the hospital that followed a violent urinary tract infection. I dealt with -- talked about, looked at, touched, raged at -- his penis until the very end.

And until the very end, the penis/phallus connection became impossible to sever. In the hospital, it was war between his penis and the doctors' discourse; or rather, my attempt to stand in as phallus for his penis -- the rights of his body -- against their authority to determine the course of his life; their wish for him to live, against his entire system's disarray (my wish for him?).

When I read one day on my father's chart in the intensive care unit, "Responds only to pain," I found it hard to share the doctor's jubilation over the signs of life dotting the monitor above his respirator. "What do you want me to do," she hissed at me across a network of tubes mapping his body, "kill your father?"

Nancy K. Miller is a distinguished essayist and critic who penned this essay in 1991.

louise bourgeois' fillette

digg reddit stumble facebook twitter subscribe

"The District Sleeps Alone Tonight" - The Hampdens (mp3)

"Social Suicide" - The Hampdens (mp3

"Croupier" - The Hampdens (mp3)

"The Last Party" - The Hampdens (mp3)

Hampdens website

Sunday
May242009

In Which Jesus Is The Best Candidate For Our Threesome

Sex With Christians

Ted Haggard came to me in a dream last night. Once I couldn't stand the sight of him. He now appeared to be truly Godlike and glowing with joy.

"What is it?" I asked. "Did you get The Good News?"

"Yes," he said, smiling radiantly, "last night while my wife and I made love for the 16th time this week." (It was only Monday but FYI time isn't real in dreams.) "And you could have that, too. But you must return to the Church and repent all your damnable sins."

He vanished like a wizard and I woke up soon after. Could it be true? I recalled seeing an interview with Ted Haggard prior to his experimentation with male prostitutes. He was standing right outside of his church, preaching about how Evangelicals really do do it better.

Ted even took it upon himself to interview men from his church outside.

"Let's say, out of 100 times when you have sex with your wife, what percentage does she climax?" he asked.

"Every one," they answered.

After feeling a pull towards spirituality and religion as of late, I've been forced to ask myself if this is why. Does every God of every major religion tell us to wait until marriage to engage in carnal activity for a reason? Could it be true that Evangelicals do have the best sex out of any group? How do they measure these skills anyway? Is God the judge?

I used to attend a church where everything was made public to the rest of the congregation, no matter how humiliating. One evening I ended up learning about one of my fellow churchgoers' addiction to internet porn, as well as his sexual encounters with his girlfriend in his parents' car. At the end of his confession we all clapped and went up to the stage to pray over him.

This was all very commonplace in my church. All of us young, unwed folk were so committed to our purity that the one girl who admitted to having "made out" with a boy was called a slut (and we would never have to justify using such a word).

Not too long ago I worked with a girl who had hair that was near-ankle-length and never wore makeup. I never thought much about it until word got around the workplace that she was heavy into G.O.D.

Being the atheist-turned-Christian-turned-skeptic that I am, I had to interrogate her.

I found out that she had only completed grade school, and was home schooled, at that. I knew that her dream life was the married life, with Jesus as the third-wheel. She told me she couldn't wait to be a trophy wife,and to have dinner on the table for her hard-working husband every day at 6 p.m.

After talking to her best friend Rebekah I learned this dream was not uncommon at all, but rather instilled in these women from when they were mere infants. Rebekah had recently gotten engaged and could not stop talking about finally being able to sweep the dust away from between her legs. She was going to start taking the pill 6 months prior to her wedding, which showed just how little she had been taught about birth control at the private Christian school she attended, before she also dropped out.

How could it be possible that devout Christian couples could learn so much from one another only after their wedding night?

Then I discovered these alternate interpretations of Bible verses meant to "aid" Christian men in pleasing their wives.

As if that wasn't kinky enough for me, I think I hit the jackpot when I found this for Bible thumpin' women who are just very in love with their husbands. This site includes an extensive list of Christian-friendly sex positions, with detailed instructions written by the very puritanical wives who have tried them. How could I not be envious? After all, what could be a better threesome than a man & wife and their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ?

Look no further. If you are having trouble with your sex life, forget 50 Ways to Leave Your Lover; try these instead.